1/8/2024 0 Comments Www.el ahly elyoumIt does not have to be the actual army that's doing "military fighting" per se. Where is it referenced too that military guns are being used? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 03:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC) You're missing the point. Archiver of Records ( talk) 03:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC) The military is doing little to nothing to stop the protsters other than firing shots into the air. That does not happen every day everywhere, in just general riots or protests. Precision aiming and military gun-fire is taking place. There's definitely an element of militaristic fighting going on. So to say, as the IP address for some reason wants to water this whole thing down, that it's "not a military conflict at all" seems to be itself biased. In fact the news media (reliable sources) are referring to it as "hand-to-hand combat". contribs) 03:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC) There's constant gun-fire.Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidboy10 ( talk 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 00:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Sure it's not a military conflict but it indeed its a conflict between civilians, If this continues like this I would propose a change to the info box to be in a "Militarybox". Abrazame ( talk) 00:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC) It's not a military conflict at all. And yes, as this is an ongoing situation, we should cite sources there for raw data, if for no other reason than to date the data and so updating sources in one place will remind us to update them elsewhere where that source is used on the page. was not in support of the American Revolution at its time it's not reasonable to elevate such generalized synthesis and POV into an infobox. To the 70 million figure, the entire population of the U.S. As Lihaas notes, it is not officially a military conflict. So i was wondering if we should we keep this or not? Lihaas ( talk) 00:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC) How is this any "military conflict" when the military is standing aside when crowds of civilians are pelting each other with stones? Maybe it's a Stone Age conflict, but how is this "military"? - 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 00:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC) We need to revert that edit. Its also more dubious to cite than the older well-sourced one. 27 Journalist dies Al Jazeera office burned to the groundĪn WP:AGF recently changed the box, and its a good idea, but im not sure were ready for that just yet.25 Accurate count for injured will come out tomorrow for now it's 5000.24.1 Editor opinions on separate section on news media attacks.20 Time to update lead a bit - what to include?.19 Human Rights Watch details on prison break.16 The role of Al-Ahly ultras in the protests.15 timeline was forked in last 24 hours - where was concensus?.12.2 Number of journalists attacked human rights members attacked.12.1 Hilton hotel helping government against journalists.11 Inserting anti-Israel bias "is important", editor says.8.3 End the chart problem right here, right now!.8.2 And so "382 confirmed deaths" crowd is back, this time striking the infobox.8 OR table of "Confirmed death toll" of 382 is back, once again.6 "Police in civilian cloth beating a protester in Cairo 1.png" II: Electric Boogaloo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |